Our Editorial Standards
At Athleticgainsdaily, we are committed to publishing accurate, evidence-based content that empowers our readers to make informed decisions about athletic performance and nutrition. Transparency, integrity, and scientific rigor guide every article we publish.
The information on this site is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making health decisions.
Our Editorial Principles
These five principles form the foundation of our editorial work and shape how we research, write, and publish content.
Evidence-Based Content
Every claim in our articles is supported by peer-reviewed research, scientific studies, or expert consensus. We cite our sources transparently and distinguish between established facts and emerging findings. Our writers evaluate the quality and relevance of research before incorporating it into our work.
Balanced Perspective
We present multiple viewpoints on complex topics and acknowledge areas where scientific opinion differs. Our goal is to educate readers, not to push a single agenda or product. When there is legitimate debate among experts, we make that clear and explain the reasoning behind different positions.
Disclosure of Conflicts
We disclose any partnerships, affiliate relationships, or financial interests that could influence our editorial decisions. Our writers and editors avoid covering topics where they have undisclosed conflicts. When a conflict exists and is relevant, we inform our readers so they can evaluate our perspective accordingly.
Accuracy and Fact-Checking
Before publication, all articles undergo rigorous fact-checking by our editorial team. We verify statistics, quotes, and technical information against authoritative sources. Our writers include links to original studies and references so readers can verify our claims independently.
Accountability and Corrections
When we make errors, we correct them promptly and transparently. Corrections are noted clearly in the article with the date and nature of the change. We welcome reader feedback and use it to improve our accuracy and clarity. Corrections do not diminish our credibility—they demonstrate our commitment to truth.
Reader-Centric Approach
Our content is written for the reader's benefit, not our own. We prioritize clarity and accessibility over jargon, and we explain complex concepts in understandable language. We consider the needs and questions of our audience at every stage of the writing process.
Meet Our Editorial Team
Our writers, editors, and advisors bring diverse expertise in sports science, nutrition, and fitness. Each team member is committed to our editorial standards and brings years of professional experience to the work.
Anna Kowalski
Editor-in-Chief
Anna has 12 years of experience in sports journalism and science communication. She holds a degree in Exercise Science and has contributed to peer-reviewed publications on athletic training and nutrition. Anna oversees all editorial decisions and fact-checking processes.
Michał Lewandowski
Senior Nutrition Writer
Michał is a registered Dietitian Nutritionist with 8 years of clinical and research experience. He specializes in sports nutrition and metabolic health. Michał ensures that all nutrition content meets evidence-based standards and addresses real-world athlete concerns.
Katarzyna Nowak
Science Editor & Research Advisor
Dr. Nowak holds a PhD in Sports Physiology and conducts research on exercise performance and adaptation. She reviews all scientific claims in our articles and advises on emerging research. Her expertise ensures our content remains current and accurate.
Piotr Górski
Fitness & Training Writer
Piotr is a certified strength and conditioning coach with 10 years of experience training athletes across multiple sports. He writes about workout programming, exercise technique, and performance optimization. Piotr brings practical field knowledge to every article.
Our Fact-Checking Process
Research and Source Verification
Our writers begin by consulting peer-reviewed journals, systematic reviews, expert consensus statements, and established clinical guidelines. Every statistic, finding, and recommendation is traced back to its original source. We prioritize recent research while acknowledging long-standing evidence.
Editorial Review and Cross-Check
Once an article is drafted, our Science Editor reviews it for accuracy, clarity, and alignment with current evidence. We cross-check all quantitative claims and verify that quotes are presented in their proper context. We evaluate the quality of sources used and flag any outdated or contradicted claims.
Expert Consultation (When Needed)
For articles on emerging topics or specialized subjects, we consult with external experts in that field. These advisors review the content to ensure accuracy and completeness. Any disagreements or alternative perspectives are documented and may be included in the article.
Final Editing and Publication
Our Editor-in-Chief performs a final check before publication, confirming that all corrections have been implemented and all sources are cited. We include references and links so readers can verify our claims. We also note the publication date and indicate if the article has been updated.
Ongoing Monitoring and Updates
After publication, we monitor for new research and reader feedback. If significant new evidence emerges that contradicts or changes our article, we update the content and document the changes. Articles are reviewed periodically for relevance and accuracy, and older articles are refreshed when needed.
Corrections and Updates Policy
How We Handle Errors
We aim for perfection, but errors can occur in any publication. When we identify a factual error—whether spotted internally or reported by a reader—we correct it promptly. Our approach to corrections is:
- Transparency: We clearly note corrections with a timestamp. Readers can see what was changed and when the change was made.
- Clarity: Correction notes explain the nature of the error and how it has been addressed. We do not attempt to hide or minimize mistakes.
- Distinction: We distinguish between factual errors (corrected in place) and minor updates to reflect new research (noted as updates, not corrections).
- Accountability: Corrections do not diminish our credibility. They demonstrate our commitment to accuracy and our willingness to be held accountable.
Report an Error or Suggest an Update
Have you found an error in one of our articles? Does our content need updating based on new research? We welcome your feedback and take all reports seriously. Please contact our editorial team with the following information:
- Article title and URL (or a clear description of the article)
- Specific claim or section that you believe contains an error or needs updating
- Evidence or source that supports your concern (link to research, expert quote, etc.)
- Your name and contact information so we can follow up with you
Send your report to: [email protected]
Our editorial team will review your report within 5 business days and respond with our findings. If a correction is warranted, it will be made and documented in the article.
Questions About Our Editorial Standards?
We are committed to transparency and dialogue with our readers. If you have questions about our publishing practices, source selection, or editorial policies, we'd like to hear from you.
Contact Our Editorial Team